Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 2
- Joined: October 12th, 2022, 8:55 pm
Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
I did a 500 meter row on Oct 9 on damper setting 6. The log said the drag factor was 136.
Then I did another 500 meter row on Oct 12 on the same damper setting of 6 and the log said the drag factor was 227.
I can't image the drag factor could really change like this. Are the drag factors listed in the a long usually accurate? Any idea why there would be such a variance?
Thanks
Then I did another 500 meter row on Oct 12 on the same damper setting of 6 and the log said the drag factor was 227.
I can't image the drag factor could really change like this. Are the drag factors listed in the a long usually accurate? Any idea why there would be such a variance?
Thanks
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
Is it the same machine? Is it in the same place with the same conditions?BodyResults wrote: ↑October 12th, 2022, 9:10 pmI did a 500 meter row on Oct 9 on damper setting 6. The log said the drag factor was 136.
Then I did another 500 meter row on Oct 12 on the same damper setting of 6 and the log said the drag factor was 227.
I can't image the drag factor could really change like this. Are the drag factors listed in the a long usually accurate? Any idea why there would be such a variance?
Thanks
If so someone more knowledgable will have to help.
If not, then different machines have different DFs with the same damper setting and the proximity of an object to the fan, or even a draught can have an effect.
Born 1963 6' 5" 100Kg
PBs from 2020 - 100m 15.7s - 1min 355m - 500m 1:28.4 - 1k 3:10.6 - 2k 6:31.6 - 5k 17:34.9 - 6k 20:57.5 - 30min @ 20SPM 8,336m - 10k 36:28.0 - 1 hour 16,094m - HM 1:18:51.7
2021 - 5k 17:26 - FM 2:53:37.0
PBs from 2020 - 100m 15.7s - 1min 355m - 500m 1:28.4 - 1k 3:10.6 - 2k 6:31.6 - 5k 17:34.9 - 6k 20:57.5 - 30min @ 20SPM 8,336m - 10k 36:28.0 - 1 hour 16,094m - HM 1:18:51.7
2021 - 5k 17:26 - FM 2:53:37.0
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
Sounds like a plausible setting on a young machine.BodyResults wrote: ↑October 12th, 2022, 9:10 pmI did a 500 meter row on Oct 9 on damper setting 6. The log said the drag factor was 136.
That is way off. 230 to 235 is what it should read when the damper is at 10 for a new machine. Collecting dust should have an opposite effect: drag going down for the same damper setting. Did you do anything abnormal? Is something causing extra drag (something that is hampering the flywheel to move, like a piece of paper that is inside the cage, some issues with bearings)? Does the rower still feel OK, or does it feel heavy?BodyResults wrote: ↑October 12th, 2022, 9:10 pmThen I did another 500 meter row on Oct 12 on the same damper setting of 6 and the log said the drag factor was 227.
I measure DF and its behaviour quite accurately, as I am the developer of Open Rowing Monitor, and we structurally compare dragfactor to the PM5. Environmental conditions usually affect drag within 2 to 3 DF points across training sessions. Within a session, at DF135, it can vary 2 to 3 DF points as well, but these are small peaks and it usually is quite stable.BodyResults wrote: ↑October 12th, 2022, 9:10 pmI can't image the drag factor could really change like this. Are the drag factors listed in the a long usually accurate? Any idea why there would be such a variance?
Package maintainer of OpenRowingMonitor, the open source Rowing Monitor
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
How was the log captured? ErgData? Most likely a glitch.
Use the PM5 "drag factor" to see what it really is.
Use the PM5 "drag factor" to see what it really is.
- Carl Watts
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
- Location: NEW ZEALAND
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
You have to be very careful with things like fans being turned on or off and pointing directly into the side of the Concept 2 fan housing, this makes a significant difference in the Drag Factor, otherwise it changes very little over the pace/rating changes maybe 2 or 3 variance.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 2
- Joined: October 12th, 2022, 8:55 pm
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
Thanks for the replies everyone.
This is a Model E in my home. No change in position no external fans involved.
I did use Ergdata on my phone to set the PM5 distance to row both times.
I just went down and checked what the PM5 said for drag doing a few strokes. It said 138. Then I used Ergdata to set it to row 100 meters and did the row. This time Ergdata said the drag was 138.
I really didn't noticed there was any physical difference in feeling of the amount of drag from the previous rows.
Perhaps the Ergdata recorded a glitch?
Doug
This is a Model E in my home. No change in position no external fans involved.
I did use Ergdata on my phone to set the PM5 distance to row both times.
I just went down and checked what the PM5 said for drag doing a few strokes. It said 138. Then I used Ergdata to set it to row 100 meters and did the row. This time Ergdata said the drag was 138.
I really didn't noticed there was any physical difference in feeling of the amount of drag from the previous rows.
Perhaps the Ergdata recorded a glitch?
Doug
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
I would assume so. A drag of 227 instead of 136, you'll feel the difference (the flywheel will feel very heavy).BodyResults wrote: ↑October 13th, 2022, 4:28 pmI just went down and checked what the PM5 said for drag doing a few strokes. It said 138. Then I used Ergdata to set it to row 100 meters and did the row. This time Ergdata said the drag was 138.
I really didn't noticed there was any physical difference in feeling of the amount of drag from the previous rows.
Perhaps the Ergdata recorded a glitch?
Package maintainer of OpenRowingMonitor, the open source Rowing Monitor
-
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11025
- Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
- Location: Liverpool, England
Re: Drag factor changed from 136 to 227 on the same damper
There will be a very notable difference between 136 and 227. I can feel the difference when the drag factor is changed by +10.JaapvanE wrote: ↑October 13th, 2022, 4:45 pmI would assume so. A drag of 227 instead of 136, you'll feel the difference (the flywheel will feel very heavy).BodyResults wrote: ↑October 13th, 2022, 4:28 pmI just went down and checked what the PM5 said for drag doing a few strokes. It said 138. Then I used Ergdata to set it to row 100 meters and did the row. This time Ergdata said the drag was 138.
I really didn't noticed there was any physical difference in feeling of the amount of drag from the previous rows.
Perhaps the Ergdata recorded a glitch?
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman