CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Maintenance, accessories, operation. Anything to do with making your erg work.
Marco
Paddler
Posts: 8
Joined: November 18th, 2020, 3:51 am
Location: Berlin

CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Marco » December 30th, 2021, 8:01 am

So, just a few days ago I updated my Model D PM5 to the newset Firmware 171 in hope for improvements with my HR sensor.
Sensor is a CooSpo HW706 strapped to my left Arm, just a bit above the biceps.
Pairing with the PM5 worked just fine, but during the workout, the PM5 shows (I think exactly) half my heartrate.
HR was displayed around 80, but was higher for sure.
That got somewhat confirmed the moment the workout was done, at that point the PM5 HR jumped straight to around 150.

Any ideas how to fix that or what I'm doing wrong?

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8011
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Citroen » December 30th, 2021, 4:13 pm

Write an email to rowing@concept2.com with details of your PM5 hardware version, PM5 firmware version and the exact model of HR sensor.

User avatar
Carl Watts
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4690
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
Location: NEW ZEALAND

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Carl Watts » December 30th, 2021, 8:51 pm

Yeah you need to get the HR from both arms or just one will be half. :lol:

Get a decent chest strap, its actually pretty hard to get consistent decent readings even with one of these. You need just the right level of moisture on the strap before you start and if you do a decent amount of rowing the battery doesn't last a year. Pretty hard not to be constantly fiddling with them to be honest for your entire 30 min row not to have wrong or no readings or else dropouts.

You only need to look at some peoples logbooks to see what a mess the HR graph is.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log

smokersteve
500m Poster
Posts: 69
Joined: December 3rd, 2019, 5:46 pm

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by smokersteve » December 30th, 2021, 11:05 pm

I have tried 3 different arm heart rate bands, one being coospoo, and they were all inaccurate with spotty readings.
Chest strap is the way to go. I have been using the COOSPO H808S chest strap for a while now and it works great for cycling, rowing, treadmill, and my elliptical. It was $30 on Amazon
53 yrs old 5’8” 138 pounds

jamesg
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4201
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 3:44 am
Location: Trentino Italy

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by jamesg » December 31st, 2021, 2:30 am

Would seem movement is what causes the problem. Without buying a chest belt or waiting for April 1st, you could try putting the sensor on your ankle, which usually doesn't travel far. Or just watch Watts; HR is a proxy for intensity, but Watts IS intensity.
08-1940, 183cm, 83kg.
2024: stroke 5.5W-min@20-21. ½k 190W, 1k 145W, 2k 120W. Using Wods 4-5days/week. Fading fast.

Dangerscouse
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10551
Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Dangerscouse » December 31st, 2021, 6:42 am

smokersteve wrote:
December 30th, 2021, 11:05 pm
Chest strap is the way to go. I have been using the COOSPO H808S chest strap for a while now and it works great for cycling, rowing, treadmill, and my elliptical. It was $30 on Amazon
Same here, and until recently when the battery needed changing I've never had an issue
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km

"You reap what you row"

Instagram: stuwenman

chipman650
Paddler
Posts: 26
Joined: August 14th, 2020, 3:01 pm

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by chipman650 » December 31st, 2021, 2:11 pm

While most personal HR monitors are really inaccurate, a chest strap is the most accurate of all the other types.

Tsnor
10k Poster
Posts: 1239
Joined: November 18th, 2020, 1:21 pm

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Tsnor » December 31st, 2021, 5:37 pm

Dangerscouse wrote:
December 31st, 2021, 6:42 am
... when the battery needed changing ...
really good thought. Sometimes the device's app can read the power level. If you can't get a good power level from your CooSpo HW706 I'd just replace the battery and see if it gets better.

mromero680
500m Poster
Posts: 95
Joined: April 19th, 2020, 5:40 pm

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by mromero680 » January 1st, 2022, 10:50 am

There are a lot of reviews on the Coospo that complain about it chewing through batteries. Any similar experience?
60 5'10"/HWT
500m: 1:36.9/ 2k: 6:59.2 / 5k: 18:53.2 / 30min: 7762 / 10k: 38:52.0 (2020 PBs)

Dangerscouse
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10551
Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Dangerscouse » January 1st, 2022, 12:05 pm

mromero680 wrote:
January 1st, 2022, 10:50 am
There are a lot of reviews on the Coospo that complain about it chewing through batteries. Any similar experience?
Not for me. I use it everytime I row and don't think I have changed the battery for about a year, so that's circa four million metres, and probably 5 or 6 hours a week.

The batteries are really cheap as well. I bought a pack of batteries (two of the correct ones, and four others) for £1.
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km

"You reap what you row"

Instagram: stuwenman

User avatar
Carl Watts
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4690
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
Location: NEW ZEALAND

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Carl Watts » January 1st, 2022, 5:47 pm

mromero680 wrote:
January 1st, 2022, 10:50 am
There are a lot of reviews on the Coospo that complain about it chewing through batteries. Any similar experience?
Unfortunately any brand of chest strap can fail by not going to "Sleep" in standby and essentially its turned on all the time.

You do of course need to remove it from the wet strap or dry the strap or it will stay "On"

I bought a second hand Polar one and it has this fault, works fine but the battery only lasts a couple of months because its effectively on 24/7.

If its ripping through batteries its faulty. I don't think some factories test the units very well for the standby current, Concept 2 didn't with the PM2+ I got in 2000, the standby current was to high and it ate the batteries in 6 months and I had to fix it. Just unlucky, should have clicked when I took it out of the box and the monitor batteries were flat.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log

smokersteve
500m Poster
Posts: 69
Joined: December 3rd, 2019, 5:46 pm

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by smokersteve » January 1st, 2022, 6:15 pm

mromero680 wrote:
January 1st, 2022, 10:50 am
There are a lot of reviews on the Coospo that complain about it chewing through batteries. Any similar experience?
The newest coospoo h808s beeps twice when it connects and beeps once when it disconnects. Within a few seconds after taking the chest strap off I hear it beep. No battery issues for me.
53 yrs old 5’8” 138 pounds

Marco
Paddler
Posts: 8
Joined: November 18th, 2020, 3:51 am
Location: Berlin

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Marco » January 2nd, 2022, 3:45 am

What I've found so far.
Strapping the sensor to my ankle or even just above the calve doesn't help.
Data remains inaccurate, but it looks like data/connection only gets lost when starting to move.
At the beginning of a workout it shows (mostly) correct heartrate and at the end too.
To reconfirm this, I connected the CooSpo to a PC, using an ASUS BT USB Dongle and monitored my HR for around 10 minutes.
HR was strapped to my lower arm, close to the elbow, distance between CooSpo and BT USB was about 1m/3foot and I sat somewhat still, wasn't moving that much.
HR got monitored perfectly without an Issue.

So, my guess is that whilst moving/rowing, the connection just gets unstable or maybe, the ConceptD is building up some static electric load that interferes with the connection, but this is somewhat beyond my capabilities or tools.

*edit*
Writing this, I wonder if the Rower and HR sensor do actually connect via BT or ANT+

mict450
6k Poster
Posts: 899
Joined: December 23rd, 2019, 3:11 pm
Location: the good, ol' U S of A

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by mict450 » January 2nd, 2022, 10:27 am

mromero680 wrote:
January 1st, 2022, 10:50 am
There are a lot of reviews on the Coospo that complain about it chewing through batteries. Any similar experience?
No problem with batteries for me.
Eric, YOB:1954
Old, slow & getting more so
Shasta County, CA, small town USA

Tsnor
10k Poster
Posts: 1239
Joined: November 18th, 2020, 1:21 pm

Re: CooSpo HR Sensor and PM5 inaccurate

Post by Tsnor » January 2nd, 2022, 11:29 am

Marco wrote:
January 2nd, 2022, 3:45 am
So, my guess is that whilst moving/rowing, the connection just gets unstable or maybe, the ConceptD is building up some static electric load that interferes with the connection, but this is somewhat beyond my capabilities or tools.
Another guess -- When you start moving the optical sensor in the band can't read the pulse correctly because you are moving. Nothing to do with the bluetooth connection.

You can check this by connecting the HR monitor to your PHONE instead of the PM5 and rowing. If you have a steady accurate HR on the phone then it's a connection to PM5 problem. If you have the same drops/errors going to your phone then its an optical sensor problem.

If you try this please post results.

Aside: i love my polar h10 belt. It's considered industry best. And it STILL has a few drops rowing. My fitbit watch never reports drops, it just makes up data to cover the gaps. A belt that never shows a drop is either better than an h10 or is making up data. Having the reported heart rate almost exactly 1/2 what is should be sounds like the belt guessed wrong when it was covering over missed readings. (and no data is perfect, so the belt making its best guess is not a bad thing - but it is an indicator that the HR sensor is struggling to get valid readings).

edit: "Writing this, I wonder if the Rower and HR sensor do actually connect via BT or ANT+" you can check this by looking at the PM5 connect menu when you are connecting to the belt. It will tell you when you make the connection. If your HRM sends both signals (like my h10) you can select which one you want to use - your belt shows up twice once for each protocol.

Post Reply