Search found 96 matches
- June 30th, 2011, 10:34 am
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
I give up, Rich shows absolutely no desire to be honest in anything, confronting him with his dishonesty makes no difference to him at all. Fred is retired.
- June 30th, 2011, 9:43 am
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
deleted
- June 30th, 2011, 9:09 am
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
deleted
- June 30th, 2011, 9:03 am
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
deleted
- June 29th, 2011, 4:08 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
12K OTErg just before dawn. Nope, ..<stuff about when you posted this morning>... I started posting _after_ I rowed. My first post was 5:37 a.m., Door County time. It is now 8:30 a.m. here. ranger I call your bluff, I believe you are not being truthful about your daily volume. Since you'll refuse t...
- June 29th, 2011, 8:44 am
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
12K OTErg just before dawn. Nope, probably not even 10k. here's your posting times this morning. You had a 40min gap between posts. Figure a couple minute to compose the post at 5:19 plus a couple minutes to walk from erg to PC, means you probably erged for not a lot over 30 minutes. 5:19 am 4:39 a...
- June 28th, 2011, 4:52 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
Rich will never answer that question when phrased in that mannerlancs wrote:Why can't you now row a 5k quicker than 18 minutes?
Did X back in Y, much better than that now.
Not interested in a 18 min 5k, his goal is Z
Racing your training is ruinous
but never a straight answer
- June 28th, 2011, 1:54 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
The next demonstration will be a FM @ 1:48 (or faster). But since you can't do 5000m @ 1:48 then how will you get to 42,195m at a pace you can't sustain? Look, if you want to stump rich, you need to phrase your statements differently. Never say "you can't do 5000m @ 1:48", because in his mind, a 20...
- June 24th, 2011, 2:14 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
4 x 1K, 1:38 @ 31 spm predicts a 6:32 2K. 20 x 1K, 1:38 @ 31 spm predicts a 6:16 2K. ranger Not true, you are getting confused again with trying to extrapolate non-continuous rowing. 4 x 1K, in 3:16 (1:38 avg) predicts a 6:32 2K. 20 x 1K, 3:16 (1:38 avg) predicts a 6:16 2K. "4x1k where I saw 1:38 e...
- June 24th, 2011, 1:10 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
Indeed you should start giving these a go.<snip> Sure. 4:00 rest would be fine. ranger You should be ok with the rest periods rich, it's the 3:16 1k's (1:38 avg pace) in between them that you'll find impossible Kind of like "it isnt the fall that hurts, it's that sudden deceleration at the end that...
- June 24th, 2011, 11:48 am
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
Zatopek 1Ks, 1:38 @ 31 spm (12 SPI) should now be possible. 20 x 1K (paddle a 1K in between). well, 20x1k at 3:50 (1:55 average pace) paddle 1k in between might be possible for you. I doubt you could do more then two or three 3:16 1k's (average pace of 1:38). but, since your post doesnt talk about ...
- June 23rd, 2011, 4:35 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
So now, if I prepare for it, I can row a FM @ 1:48. that's fine, because it clearly shows your acknowledgment that you can not currently (present tense) do it, you are saying that you will be able to do it at some point in the future. "This is fine. Sure, I can carry both suitcases, although I neve...
- June 23rd, 2011, 3:29 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
can a. Used to indicate physical or mental ability. ... c. Used to indicate possession of a specified capability or skill.<stuff on why you think it is a lock again, deliberate misuse, you cropped that portion of the definition that clarified the tense (current or future). Similar to the way you cr...
- June 23rd, 2011, 3:17 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
it's pretty clear you are deliberately misusing words to create the false impression that you have an ability that in fact you do not possess Not at all. <bunch more stuff about why you consider your future 2:32:0 FM (average pace 1:48) a lock> reference my other post :D Regardless of how much a lo...
- June 23rd, 2011, 3:15 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Ranger's training thread
- Replies: 17113
- Views: 5753845
Re: Ranger's training thread
So you are saying that you "can" do a 2:32:0 FM (average pace 1:48), but you can't do it right now . You are deliberately misusing the word "can", you should be using "could", as in "I think I should be able to". My talk in this way is entirely legitimate if you know endurance sports (and rowing in...