Concept2 Forum

To their credit Concept (or whoever ran the 1,000m Challenge) did bounce the clearly erroneous times that led the Men's 60-69 AG at various times over the weekend. Does anybody know how they decide if a time is not valid?

Dear All: I have sent a detailed email to several Concept addresses dissecting the current First Place Holder's time in the Men's 60-69 Age Group. Among the anomalies: 3:08.0 (I think the terminal zero often indicates a pace submission, except for 10%);time is 8 seconds off the world record and 5 se...

Jackarabit:

Thanks for the information on methods to falsify times. Who and how at Concept should be contacted about these implausible results or do they do a good job on flagging outliers?
Sorry if I butchered your screen name.

Ted

Thanks for information on "impossible" times. The former Overall Leader and Age Group 60-69 leader with a 2:40.0 has been stricken from the results. Now the current 60-69 age group leader is an unknown with 32,000 lifetime meters and a time of 4:50 for 1,000m from two days ago. Now he has submitted ...

This is my first post. As the guy currently in 4th place in the 1000m Sprint Challenge(a placing I am sure will drop as the weekend rolls on) does Concept have a history of policing and discarding results that are clearly erroneous? Such as the 2:40 in my age group(60-69) which also is first overall...