Concept2 Forum

mrfit wrote:Amen Bob, when I rowed It was all sweep 4's and 8's . I thought those that rowed anything else were just side shows. 8's HAUL!

But nothing beats a pair if you want to become a good sweep rower.

ranger wrote:
Don't know the cause, other than overtraining, I suppose, but my right side caved in today.

ranger

ranger...the master of hyperbole..."caved in."

Paul, I say lock this thread as it's really not about "Ranger's training." There's really nothing of substance about his training no matter how many times he claims there is. My suggestion is to start a new thread called "Ranger's Thread" and put it in the proper category. Definitely something other...

The goal not is 6:16 at 60. The 30s lwt American record is 6:14.5. ranger See ranger can tell the truth. It happens maybe once every 100 pages or so. Sorry, but that's not the truth. The 30s lwt American record is 6:16.5, not 6:14.5. My mistake. ranger Ah, but the other part is still true.

ranger wrote: The goal not is 6:16 at 60.

The 30s lwt American record is 6:14.5.

ranger

See ranger can tell the truth. It happens maybe once every 100 pages or so.

Nosmo wrote: RC is often called the time constant.

RC = Rich Cureton? Is that because no matter how much time passes he's constantly spouting the same BS?

They were mainly in large boats but there were three young women in singles. The three all looked good and in particular one of them looked just like she should be featured in a technique videos: an absolutely gorgeous... That's all well and good Byron but what about her Force Curve? It's all about...

Citroen wrote:
...Rangy's bog.

Intentional? Even if not, it's still accurate.

Bob S. wrote:
Check this morning's figure:

77 df. by ranger
on Fri May 06, 2011 12:55 am

Drag Factor du jour?

Whether it's ranger or Brussels sprouts, it's the same end result.

Even without ranger this thread is full of bs...

Just out of curiosity, did anybody think ranger would post any of the pieces he said he'd do by May 1st? I think he might have tried some of them, but found he was no where near what he claimed he could do and gave up without finishing them.

ranger wrote:

Gus wrote:Same end result

Yes.

The "end result" has been excellent.

ranger

That we can agree upon. 10,000+ thread posts. No one has or likely will come close.

I am no longer training. I am preparing to race. My training is over. ranger This is for Byron, because he'll be quoting this in the near future when you use the excuse of not having prepared for racing when your result ends up being so far off your prediction. That's if you do your race in a publi...

I am not sure why you want to measure _anything_ when you are training. All the cognitive overlay is counterproductive, if not destructive. ranger Then why do you measure your force curve? And, how do you figure your SPI, 1:48 pace, HR of 155 is 75% HRR, ratio, weight, % of body fat if you are not ...