Search found 4 matches
- June 25th, 2006, 9:53 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Converting walking to rowing
- Replies: 64
- Views: 66264
Walking is more of an all round exercise and you use your legs more than in rowing, which is mostly an upper body exercise. oh my god.. everything you say gets more ridiculous you are a crazy old man.. im sorry.. for the amount of time you apparently spend rowing and talking about rowing... jesus.....
- May 28th, 2006, 5:06 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Jacking the erg - Effective training?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 34324
no.. in statistics, the correlation of .88 would be the value of r squared. there is no reason to square the correlation. a .88 correlation to a 4:00 mile would be much much closer than 4:33. i dont know where you got that number. the relationship is also not linear. but regardless, i don't know exa...
- May 28th, 2006, 3:21 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: coaching the erg
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2690
coaching the erg
hi, i'm a rower and my cousin from california is visiting with me for a couple weeks.. he asked me to show him how to use the rower so i spent a while coaching him.. he made all the normal novice mistakes i.e. legs up before hands on recovery, arms broken at catch, shooting the slide. after a while ...
- May 28th, 2006, 3:13 pm
- Forum: Training
- Topic: Jacking the erg - Effective training?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 34324
You disagree, and then you agree with me, make up your mind. You can't have it both ways. Either it's a good predictor or it isn't. A high correlation doesn't mean a good predictor. If you predict a 4:00 mile and someone runs 4:00 / .88 = 4:33 then do you consider that a good predictor. vo2 max is ...