

\Cyclingman1 wrote:johnb wrote:I am trying to improve my 2k time. I finally broke 8 minutes @ 7:55, I am wanting to improve my time so I can row more meters in a much shorter time. I can't seem to row fast at fewer then 35 strokes per minute.I wouldn't deny that plans can be good. But they are one-size-fits all. Also, they are somewhat complicated. All of the plans have the following elements: long, slow; intermediate, faster; and a series of shorter intervals even yet faster. Most people can probably come up with a plan that suits them that incorporates those types of rows. One can adjust based on their experiences.ronmardix wrote:As for improving your 2k time, have a look at the Pete Plan:
http://thepeteplan.wordpress.com/the-pete-plan/
If you are a beginner, you will probably want to start with the Beginner Training plan (from the same site) before moving to the actual Pete Plan:
http://thepeteplan.wordpress.com/beginner-training/
See the training forum for variouis discussions on training.
Stroke rate comes in for a fair amount of dialog in the forums. There are many advocates for rowing down around 20 SPM. But there are plenty of rowers who never come close to those low SPMs. 35 is probably a bit high for 2K unless one has huge aerobic capacity. But 30 is reasonable. That is not too fast for a full long stroke. It does require quite a bit of power to row at the same pace at 20 SPM as at 30 SPM.
The C2 ranking system is both a plus and a minus. On the good side one gets to see how they stack up against their equals, but on the bad side one gets to see how they stack up against their equals. It can drive you nuts.CONLEJM wrote:One thing I found very inspiring last year were the ranking by age/weight/gender/distance/time. They were very motivational to me. At first I thought I would be happy at the 75th percentile across each distance. Good enough, right? But then 90th percentile looked pretty good. Then 95th percentile, 98th percentile, etc. You become very competitive with people in other countries, all over the world. You get ahead of them one day, and then the next day you see they bested you by a tenth of a second!!
My point is that not every one wants to have their every row programmed. I'm one of those. I did my own training from day one. A generic plan cannot know how one is feeling on a daily or weekly basis. So then one has to adjust the plan some or maybe a lot. Once a plan doesn't fit, then one is not far away from doing their own. To each their own.ronmardix wrote:Oh yeah, oops, sorry. Not sure what I was thinking recommending the Pete Plan to a beginner asking for help. My bad.
I like the Nonathlon and a number of us here participate. But I actually find it MORE competitive than the Concept2 ranking process. From my perspective, it's one thing for a young man to lose a race to other young men ... but when you also lose to elderly women ... that's a tough race!Cyclingman1 wrote: There is another ranking system at nonathlon.com. In that system there is only one ranking taking into account ten rowing distances. The rankings are age, gender, & weight handicapped. Last yr, the overall winner was a 65 yr old female. That system feels a whole lot less competitive than the C2 ranking system. Take a look at it, if you are interested. Signing up is
Trying, anyway. Nothing major but a crap-load of minor stuff that is all adding up. "Hormonal changes", let's just say, have brought on joint stiffness and pain (not to mention hella sleep problems). That has me going to PT for a stretching/strengthening regimen geared for my issues. Helping, but it takes a lot of time. Mild lower back ailment from said PT. Carpal tunnel acting up from being back to work. Feet hurting, but PT has taught me ice massage which is a great thing. And at my annual physical last week, the doc finds a heart murmur, so I need an echocardiogram and carotid artery ultrasound.Izzzmeister wrote:
Lisa H - 6,173 Getting back into the swing of things!
Suck it up and row harder!CONLEJM wrote:I like the Nonathlon and a number of us here participate. But I actually find it MORE competitive than the Concept2 ranking process. From my perspective, it's one thing for a young man to lose a race to other young men ... but when you also lose to elderly women ... that's a tough race!Cyclingman1 wrote: There is another ranking system at nonathlon.com. In that system there is only one ranking taking into account ten rowing distances. The rankings are age, gender, & weight handicapped. Last yr, the overall winner was a 65 yr old female. That system feels a whole lot less competitive than the C2 ranking system. Take a look at it, if you are interested. Signing up is
Now THAT'S exemplary team spirit! Welcome aboard!EdMcCarthy wrote:Thanks for the welcome! I'm coming back from a knee injury and starting to put more time on the erg, so I figured that joining the team that will *obviously* win the Fall Team Challenge will keep me motivated.![]()
Ed McCarthy
CONLEJM wrote:I like the Nonathlon and a number of us here participate. But I actually find it MORE competitive than the Concept2 ranking process. From my perspective, it's one thing for a young man to lose a race to other young men ... but when you also lose to elderly women ... that's a tough race!
I agree that "older" rowers will find nonathlon more congenial. Afterall, 60+ rowers stand no chance against the 30-50 year olds. It may not be a perfect system, but the guy who came up with nonathlon has done a pretty good job.damselfly wrote:Suck it up and row harder!
It seems that 40-59 is a time when many come to rowing. I wish that I had. I also notice, based on FTC entries, that only 4 in TimbukTOO have crossed the 60 threshold. Trust me, the 60s are way different than the 50s. The mind may be willing but the body on many days is saying "no, no,no." Even though I am a Johnny-come-lately to rowing, I'm glad I found it. It is making the 60s seem a little easier. Just letting you guys know that 65 is a non trivial age when it comes to getting the old body to work, even though one has an athletic background.damselfly wrote:You're coming up fast on an age where 65 isn't going to seem "elderly"...
Well for a Johnny-come-lately, your times/paces listed in your signature are incredible!!!Cyclingman1 wrote:Even though I am a Johnny-come-lately to rowing, I'm glad I found it.
Very funny and a good point!damselfly wrote:From our friends at Rowing Memes...